Das Forum Grüne Vernunft


FGV Online Petition

Rettet die Kinder! Jetzt unterzeichnen!


Gentechnik ist Alltag

Hier erfahren Sie mehr über unsere Aktivitäten.


Über uns

Das Forum Grüne Vernunft
Ist eine Initiative von Privatpersonen, die offensiv über die Grüne Gentechnik informieren will. Unser Ziel ist es, ...


Mitmachen

Wir wollen mithelfen, dass die Chancen dieser Technologie auch in Deutschland genutzt werden können. Auch sie können mithelfen. Machen Sie mit bei unserem offensiven Netzwerk „Aktiv für die Gentechnik“.

Spenden

Hier haben Sie die Möglichkeit, uns mit einer Spende zu unterstützen.

Highest courts in France and EU confirm France's ban on GM crops is illegal

warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/html/themes/theme368/node-simplenews.tpl.php on line 153.
Es bleibt dabei: das Mon810-Anbauverbot in Frankreich entbehrt jeglicher juristischen Grundlage. Auch in Deutschland wurde der Mon810 von Ministerin Ilse Aigner (CSU) untersagt.
Brussels, 28 November 2011
 
Today, France’s highest court, the Conseil d’Etat, has confirmed that the European Court of Justice’s judgment that the 2008 French ban on the cultivation of genetically modified crops (GM) is illegal.  Both courts overturned the national ban declaring that the French Government presented no scientific evidence of any risk to health or the environment from these crops.
 
Carel du Marchie Sarvaas, EuropaBio’s Director of Green Biotechnology Europe, commented, “These judgments from the highest European court and the highest French court send one message loud and clear: bans of GM crops cannot be based on political dogma.  As both judgments state, no ban on planting GM crops can be declared without valid scientific evidence, something that France and other European countries have not produced.”
 
A ban on agricultural innovation is not without cost, such as yield loss due to pests and a block on investment in public and private sector agricultural Research & Development.  “Farmers in France were growing over 20,000 hectares of GM maize in 2007, the third year of commercial cultivation of this crop before this illegal ban. Four years later, the real loss caused by this ban is French farmers’ ability to control pests that affect both the yield and quality of their maize. France’s leaders must now decide whether they want to regain their position as a leader of agricultural innovation, tackle future global challenges and create jobs and investment in agriculture, or support an anti-science agenda that weakens Europe’s competitiveness”, continued Carel du Marchie Sarvaas.
 
A study by the EU’s Joint Research Centre[1] showed that this maize increased farm income by up to €122 per hectare, led to higher average yields of 11.8% in an area of heavy insect pressure, and resulted in a reduction in insecticide costs by as much as €20.04 per hectare.  Over the four year duration of the illegal French ban, farmers therefore potentially missed out on over €40 million of income and did not produce over 370,000 tons of maize that could have helped meet the needs of a hungry world.
 
 
ENDS
Notes to Editors
According to European Union law, emergency measures regarding GM crops can be invoked only in case of the existence of a situation which is likely to constitute a clear and serious risk to human health, animal health or environment.   Over the last 15 years, GM crops have been cultivated on a total of over one billion hectares (three billion acres) worldwide and have proven agronomic, economic and environmental benefits. Their safety has been consistently confirmed. 
 
In 2008, pending the authorization renewal for MON810 maize under Regulation EC 1829/2003, the French government banned its cultivation, citing risk to health and the environment.  The top legal advisor to the European Court of Justice, Advocate General Paolo Mengozzi, gave his opinion that only the EU itself could institute such bans and that the French government did not have the authority to adopt the ban.  Advocate General Mengozzi also underlined that risk invoked to justify a ban cannot be hypothetical.
 
[1] Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (2008). "Adoption and performance of the first GM crop introduced in EU agriculture: Bt maize in Spain.” Also published in Nature Biotechnology, April 2008.
 
Additional resources:
 
For further information, please contact:
Carel du Marchie Sarvaas
Director, Green Biotechnology Europe
Tel: +32 2 739 11 85
Mobile: +32 473 890 359
Email: c.dmsarvaas@europabio.org
Blog:
www.seedfeedfood.eu
Twitter: @EuropaBio and @SeedFeedFood 
 
Molly Hurley-Dépret
Communications Officer, Green Biotechnology Europe
Tel: +32 2 739 11 62
Mobile: +32 473 334 875
Email: m.hurley@europabio.org
Blog: www.seedfeedfood.eu
Twitter: @EuropaBio and @SeedFeedFood 
 
About EuropaBio
EuropaBio's mission is to promote an innovative and dynamic biotechnology based industry in Europe. EuropaBio, (the European Association for Bioindustries), has 62 corporate and 7 associate members operating worldwide, 2 Bioregions and 19 national biotechnology associations representing some 1800 small and medium sized enterprises. http://www.europabio.org/
 


[1]  Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (2008). "Adoption and performance of the first GM crop introduced in EU agriculture: Bt maize in Spain.” Also published in Nature Biotechnology, April 2008.